Compare POC and Spike

In software development, both Proof of Concept (POC) and Spike are terms used to describe different types of exploratory activities, but they serve distinct purposes and are executed at different stages of a project. Here are the key differences between POC and Spike documents:

Purpose:

POC: A Proof of Concept is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of a specific concept, idea, or technology. It is intended to show that a particular solution or approach is viable and can be implemented successfully.

Spike: A Spike is conducted to investigate and gather information about a specific technical challenge or unknown aspect of a project. It is aimed at reducing the risk and uncertainty associated with a particular problem.

Scope:

POC: Typically, a POC focuses on a broader aspect of the system or project. It may involve testing the integration of different components, validating the feasibility of a new technology, or demonstrating a specific feature.

Spike: The scope of a Spike is narrower and more focused on addressing a specific technical question or problem. It is not intended to produce a complete solution but to gather information and make informed decisions.

Implementation:

POC: The implementation of a POC is often more comprehensive. It may involve writing actual code and developing a small-scale version of the system or feature to prove its feasibility. Spike: The implementation of a Spike is often minimal. It may involve research, experimentation, and exploration of different options to gain insights into the problem at hand.

Documentation:

POC: POC documentation often includes detailed information about the implementation, technology choices, and findings. It aims to provide evidence that the proposed concept can be successfully realized.

Spike: Spike documentation is focused on presenting the findings and insights gained during the investigation. It may include recommendations, potential solutions, and considerations for addressing the identified challenges.

Stakeholder Involvement:

POC: Stakeholders, including developers, product owners, and management, are typically involved in the POC process to gather feedback and make informed decisions about the project’s direction.

Spike: While stakeholders may be informed about the progress and findings of a Spike, the primary audience is often the development team. The goal is to make informed technical decisions based on the insights gained.

Summary

In summary, a POC is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of a broader concept or solution, and it often involves more comprehensive implementation. On the other hand, a Spike is conducted to explore and gather information about a specific technical challenge, with a focus on minimizing risk and uncertainty. Both activities are valuable in managing risk and making informed decisions during the software development process.